Unlocked and keys left in cars

Most motor insurance policies now exclude cover for theft if the vehicle is left unlocked and unattended or if the keys are left in or on the vehicle. If this applies to your case, this exclusion is highlighted in our Statement of Facts or in your register and employers need to make absolutely sure that any vehicle user is aware of the situation and complies with it. It would be highly expensive for the business if a vehicle is stolen and the insurer refuses to pay out. Clients are sometimes unclear over the wording and often claim that insurers have applied the exclusion unfairly and ask us to fight the situation on their behalf. The Financial Services Ombudsman is the final arbiter in insurance disputes and often their decisions can be used as a precedent in our arguments with insurers. The main areas of disputes are:
  • The vehicle is unattended when it is left momentarily but is still in the drivers sight. This can apply on deliveries etc,
  • It is unattended on garage forecourts whilst paying for fuel
  • Keys are left in the lock whilst gates etc, are being opened
  • Vehicles are being warmed up unattended in cold weather
  • Someone rushes back into the house or business premises because something has been forgotten leaving vehicle unlocked
It is impossible to prejudge the situation regarding acceptance of a claim but insurers would take into account
  • Where the car was at the time of the incident
  • Whether the driver was in a position to deter the theft or make the theft unlikely
  • Whether the driver was recklessly disregarding the risk of theft
  • Any mitigating factors that caused the driver to leave the car and keys
Whilst we will argue your case as best we can, it is only if special circumstances apply that we can be successful. It is very important that you make sure all existing and new employees who drive company vehicles are aware of the situation and the message is regularly reinforced. Back to news

The Deepwater Rig Disaster

The scale was enormous but environmental damage could equally destroy smaller businesses.

A year ago, it would have been inconceivable that BP, the largest British listed company could face financial meltdown in the next 12 months. Yet, for a period in the early summer, there were doubts whether the business could survive the disastrous oil leakage in the Gulf of Mexico. The costs of the disaster covering the rig itself clean-up costs and potential loss of profits and compensation claims, threatened to overwhelm the company. Strict liability for environmental damage meant that, initially, BP had to bear all the costs before it can begin to try to recover some from other parties. There are still threats of criminal prosecutions and huge fines. There was enormous damage to the reputation of the business that, even now, could have far-reaching consequences for the future of the business. The total economic loss for BP could still be $50bn and whilst it will now survive, the business will never be the same. BP may have limited insurance cover but the vast amount of the loss has had to be borne by the company. The scale of the event is mind-blowing but is a lesson for all businesses, especially those who handle or store substances that can cause pollution or occupy premises where a previous usage may still cause problems. A business that causes environmental damage is strictly liable in the UK without any defence. The maxim is the polluter pays. Whilst a loss on the scale of BP is hard to imagine, businesses can still face huge costs if they cause pollution. Insurance cover under normal policies may be limited. Any claims arising out of a gradual pollution is unlikely to be covered and, whilst Liability policies may cover sudden and unforeseen pollution, cover could be limited for clean-up and any potential financial claims. Policies may be in place to cover prosecution costs but not fines. There are specialist covers available for environmental impairment risks and these should be considered for any business where a potential hazard exists. BP may be an extreme example but a small company could be equally threatened as a result of a leaking tank, an unfortunate spillage or a long forgotten disposal of materials which were considered harmless then but now regarded as toxic. If you have any concerns, do not hesitate to contact us.